Challenge the record.
Forecast contracts, sources, resolutions, and corrections are reviewable. Material changes remain visible rather than silently replacing history.
What to report
- incorrect eligibility, dates, taxonomy, or lock time;
- a missing earlier qualifying public source;
- a source that does not support the recorded outcome;
- a conflict of interest or sponsor/editorial concern;
- personal data, confidential applicant information, harassment, or safety risk;
- a technical submission, revision, or scoring defect.
How to submit
During Gate Zero, send the forecast URL, the exact disputed statement, supporting source, publication timestamp, and requested action to hello@cadenza.work.
Do not email leaked applicant lists, private messages, identity documents, or unnecessary personal data.
Response and restriction
Credible confidentiality, identity, consent, doxxing, or immediate-harm reports trigger rapid restriction and preservation before ordinary review. Other corrections enter the evidence queue with a recorded owner, severity, deadline, and review trail.
Correction history
A material correction creates a new resolution or contract version, records the reason and reviewer, rebuilds affected scores from the ledger, and remains linked to the prior version. Cadenza does not silently rewrite the historical record.
Something unclear or incorrect?
Use the corrections process before relying on an assumption.